Minish cap library books
![minish cap library books minish cap library books](http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/3ndP2swVTQw/hqdefault.jpg)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. Reviews and awards table is a bit too wide - can this be fixed?Ĭheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide ( H 2O) 08:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Automated peer review.The gameplay section should come before the plot, IMO.Some more real world refs (not Ezlo quotes) would be good in it too. The plot section is slightly crufty and long - I think you should merge it with the gameplay section, or at least shorten it to really relevant info.Especially the first one needs a more detailed caption. I'm not sure you need 4 images - remove one, or better explain them.A few things that can make it even better. Mostly a good article, and no point going on hold. DreamingLady 07:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC) GA pass Anyway, I'm not against an Ezlo page, especially considering there's pretty much nothing about him right now. I'd actually prefer to see the Midna page turned into a Link's sidekick page. Midna didn't really deserve it, but I guess that's a matter of opinion. JackSparrow Ninja 10:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC) There is/should be more then enough to tell about him. DreamingLady 10:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Just like Midna, Ezlo definitely deserves his own page. Unlike little miss tp, Ezlo got a proper role as a sidekick and therefore, there's just not a lot of info about him. Because, no matter what we think about Ezlo's popularity/importance, there's just not a lot of info on the little dude, so not enough for his own page. Widkid85 23:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC) There's nothing else to say though - is there? UltimateNagash 15:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Why not make a Four Sword-saga character page? Ezlo can have a bigger article on such a page. He isnt an xtremely important character in the series, but he does seem to be a popular one. I think that maybe ezlo should have his own page. ReyBrujo 01:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Ezlo You could move it to a gaming wiki, though. Sraan 00:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC) No objections from me. This kind of game FAQ content is not appropriate for Wikipedia. If there aren't objections, I'd like to delete the Items, Skills, Crests, and Bosses sections. groovygower ( talk) 20:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC) Guide-like content Even though it's a direct sequel to Ocarina of Time, just like Phantom Hourglass is to The Wind Waker, 'The Legend' regarding the Triforce isn't there in either of them and for me, that's what makes it non 'core'/main. Although I don't know if I would say that Majora's Mask is a 'core'/main game. Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.117.40 ( talk) 02:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Because it's a handheld game. He didn't appear until Four Swords (which was little more than a remake of A Link To The Past). Mavrickindigo ( talk) 22:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Vaati wasn't in Majora's Mask. Odd since Vaati's been in much more games than Majora. contribs) Why is Majora's mask a main game and this a sub-game?.Preceding unsigned comment added by ( talk A Link to the Past (talk) 18:46, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Game And let me remind you that both the Oracles and The Minish Cap are developed by Flagship, not Capcom.
![minish cap library books minish cap library books](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a2/0c/b7/a20cb7d0a7e56bdea4bf481221a5f95d.jpg)
Why is The Minish Cap considered a Side-Story when the Oracle games, also developed by Capcom, are not? - zeppelincheetahīecause the Oracle games involve Ganon, Link and Princess Zelda. Late to the party here, but the European edition was released in 2004 and the American one 2005- for once, the European release was earlier, and consequently the European version includes the so-called glitch that the game suggests you can help all of the three fairies, whereas by the American release, it's made clearer that you can't. The North American release date was earlier this month. One thing, though-is the North American release date in 2004 or 2005? Under the picture says 2004, but the bottom says 2005, so I'm assuming only one is correct. This is pretty good, and I especially like how it is explained in the context of other Zelda games. 3 Why is Majora's mask a main game and this a sub-game?.